If you would ask them, "Well, why would the Jews make up this myth? That in and of itself makes Holocaust denial a form of antisemitism because the rationale they give--to get money and to get a state--are of course at the center of the stereotypes associated with antisemitism. But softcore denial does not deny the Holocaust. There were people who would say, "Well, of course the Holocaust happened, but was it really six million? Of course the Holocaust happened, but were there really gas chambers?
First of all for, deniers to be right, who has to be wrong? Well certainly all the survivors. You have the bystanders, but most of all, you have the perpetrators. What they said was, "I didn't do it. I was only following orders. The audience often are antisemites who are looking to have their feelings confirmed or people who might not be overt antisemites but somehow are discomforted with the idea of Jew as victim.
The legal procedures launched every so often against the deniers prove that the problem is real. It a problem not only for public prosecutors, but also a challenge for historians and educational institutions.
There is nothing new about denial of the crime of genocide or silence about genocide. From the beginning of the war, mainly for political reasons, the Nazis themselves did everything they could to keep international public opinion, and above all the Allied and neutral countries, but also the potential victims, in the dark about the extermination of people in the occupied countries.
Among themselves, however, the narrow circle of the Nazi ruling elite did not conceal these criminal acts. HolocaustUK pic. At the ceremony, survivors lit six candles to represent the six million Jewish victims. Grandmother Rachel Levy, 87, who survived the Auschwitz concentration camp as a teenager and came to the UK after the war, said she was frightened by the anti-Semitism in Britain today.
Although Jews were the Nazis' main target, a wide range of other groups were persecuted during the Holocaust, including gay people, minority races, political opponents like communists and trade unionists, and Jehovah's Witnesses.
A quarter of a million mentally ill and disabled people and half a million Roma also known as gypsies were killed. Holocaust survivor Steven Frank, who was one of 93 children to survive the Theresienstadt camp in Czechoslovakia along with his two brothers, said the survey's findings were "terribly worrying". His father, who helped hide Jews as part of the Dutch resistance, was arrested in Amsterdam and gassed at Auschwitz, in Nazi-occupied Poland, in January Mr Frank, who now lives in Hertfordshire, said he was "surprised" by the number of people who do not believe the Holocaust took place.
The year-old said: "In my experience, people don't have a solid understanding of what happened during the Holocaust and that's one of the reasons I am so committed to sharing what happened to me. A third German lawsuit involving Otto Frank as a joint plaintiff ran from to The two cases were tried together.
The appeal case dragged on for so long mainly because an investigation was first carried out by the Federal Criminal Police Office, and it was then decided to wait for the German translation of The Diary of Anne Frank the Critical Edition.
This appeared in , and could be used as evidence. One of his appeals was successful: the distribution of libel in pamphlets carries the comparatively short time limit for prosecution of six months, so the case was dropped because this statutory limitation had expired.
The Anne Frank House has opposed attacks on the authenticity of the diary in its statements and writings and also, in a number of cases, by legal means. Together with other organisations, the Anne Frank House took legal action against the revisionist mail-order company Vrij Historisch Onderzoek Free Historical Research, VHO , one of the main distributors of material denying the Holocaust and attacking the diary of Anne Frank in the Dutch-speaking world.
This book contained the Faurisson report and an introduction by the Free Historical Research publisher Siegfried Verbeke.
The booklet was also sent unsolicited to libraries and private individuals in the Netherlands. They demanded a ban on the distribution of the booklet in the Netherlands, under penalty of a fine of 25, Dutch guilders. In December the Amsterdam District Court found for the plaintiffs and upheld their demand for a ban, a judgement that was confirmed on appeal in Also other legal actions against Free Historical Research, which has greatly expanded its activities via the Internet, have been conducted.
Throughout the last decades of the twentieth century, doubt was cast on the authenticity of the diary of Anne Frank mainly through booklets, pamphlets and brochures from obscure Nazi publishers. The vast majority of these tracts barely, or never, reached a general public.
But with the arrival of the Internet, distributors of Holocaust denial material have gained many new opportunities. Where this is concerned the Internet is not only a wonderful, unbelievably huge library, but also a dunghill. The question of what is the best and most effective way of combating Holocaust denial and the distribution of lies about the diary of Anne Frank on the Internet is a complicated one.
Partly because of the way the Internet operates across national borders, legal measures are not straightforward. Some revisionist and neo-Nazi groups use Internet service providers outside of Europe in order to escape legal action. The United States has a different tradition of legal powers against libel and defamation, so that Holocaust denial does not easily lead to prosecution.
On these sites, facts, figures and documents disprove the lies of revisionist reports, based on the philosophy that facts are the best and only remedy against the spreading of lies. Website that discusses the techniques of Holocaust denial. Includes a FAQ section and details the denial of science, the toxicity of hydrogen cyanide, misrepresentation of the Holocaust, and fabrications concerning the Holocaust.
He lost. Go in-depth There are books, pamphlets and websites claiming that the diary is a forgery, that it is written by people other than Anne Frank herself, and that it was partly written with a ballpoint pen. I fought against this in and won, but the same accusations are still being expressed, and I have to fight against them over and over again.
Legal actions Over the years a number of people have tried to spread the claim that the diary of Anne Frank is a forgery. Political agenda The attacks on the authenticity of the diary need to be seen in a wider perspective. Television and Internet In Europe and North America the distribution of material in which the authenticity of the diary of Anne Frank is attacked — and often that the Holocaust is denied — is fortunately only the work of a few people.
Exactly what writings by Anne Frank have been preserved? Other texts Besides her diary, Anne also wrote Verhaaltjes, en gebeurtenissen uit het Achterhuis Tales from the Secret Annexe in a large accounts book, and she filled a small, narrow cash book with quotations: her Mooie Zinnenboek Favourite Quotes Notebook. Prepare for publication To help in the search for a publisher for Het Achterhuis The Secret Annexe , as Anne had named her second version Otto Frank had parts of the diary entries typed out in late What research has been done into the authenticity of the diary?
Where did the five new diary pages suddenly appear from? Are there really entries in the diary in ballpoint pen? Who claim that the diary of Anne Frank is a forgery? Historical revisionism Holocaust deniers — also called negationists — come in all shapes and sizes.
Anti-zionism Holocaust denial does not only take place in the western world, but also — and in recent years increasingly — in the Middle East. Lawful or unlawful It is only after a statement has been made, that a court can decide if it is unlawful.
The first allegations The first allegations against the diary came in and in obscure Swedish and Norwegian periodicals.
0コメント